Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2011 (4) TMI 860

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Mr. Rajiv Sharma, Advocate for the respondent.   ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J.   This order will dispose of I.T.A. Nos.541, 667, 669 and 670 of 2010 as all the four appeals involve same questions. I.T.A. No.541 of 2010 has been preferred by the revenue under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, "the Act") against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delh....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....  II. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Ld. ITAT was right in law in declaring the proceedings pursuant to the notice as illegal and invalid despite the specific saver provided under the Act by way of section 292B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 without even considering and discussing the said section because in view of section 292B the Ld. ITAT should have set as....