Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2011 (3) TMI 1286

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Petitioner. Shri Hari Radhakrishnan, for the Respondent. [Judgment per : Chitra Venkataraman, J.]. - The Revenue seeks reference on the following substantial questions of law as against the order of the Tribunal. "(a) Whether the Tribunal is correct in deciding the date of filing of Bill of Entry as 1-6-98? (b) Whether there was proper presentation of Bill of Entry on 1-6....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... On the same day, carrying out the corrections, Bill of Entry has represented i.e. on 1-6-1998 itself. It is an admitted fact that the Special Additional duty of Customs was introduced on the midnight of ½ of June 1998. The Revenue rejected the plea of the assessee that on the relevant date of representation of the Bill of Entry, there was no such Special Additional Duty of Customs. The as....