2011 (3) TMI 1229

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Ravindran 1. This appeal is directed against the order-in-appeal No.PI/264/03 dated 20/08/2003. 2. Heard both sides and perused the records. 3. The issue involved in this case is regarding the demand of differential duty during the period April 2000 to March 2001 in respect of the captively consumed goods.  The show-cause notice proceeds on the grounds that the appellant is liabl....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he demand in show-cause notice, we find that there is some error in calculation of duty in the show-cause notice. Instead of going into the factual matrix of the case, as to how the duty needs to be calculated; we are of the view that this issue should be gone into detail by the adjudicating authority and arrive at the correct duty liability of the appellants. In view of this without expressing an....