2011 (3) TMI 1194
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....JDR, for respondent Per: Ashok Jindal 1. The appellants are in appeal along with stay application and application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal. 2. The Ld. Advocate for the appellant submits that the Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs & Service, Aurangabad passed the impugned order on 27/03/2008. The order was not self explanatory. Thereafter, they interprete....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....sal. 4. We have gone through the impugned order and the order part of the impugned order is re-produced herein as under:- "Under Section 11A (1) of Central Excise Act, 1944, I confirm the demands of duties against the accesses for a period of one year prior to the date of issue of show causes for the amounts as indicated in Co.6 (a) of Annexure to this order. Assessee have agreed to....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....te and inform to assesses about the amount of interest payable and assesses should pay the same". 5. On going through the above said order, we find that it is an admitted fact that the extended period of limitation is not invocable in this case as per the order. It is coming out that the interest has been asked on the payment made by the appellants voluntarily prior to the period of limi....
TaxTMI