2011 (3) TMI 1190
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....R for the respondent Per: Mr. Ashok Jindal, Member (Judicial) By this appeal, the appellants are challenging the impugned order wherein demand against them has been confirmed along with interest and penalty. Ld. advocate for the appellants submits that a show-cause notice was issued to them on the allegation that :- i) non filing the correct particulars in clas....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....bid; vi) without cover of a Central Excise invoice as required under Rule 173G(2) read with Rule 52A ibid; vii) non filing the return showing correct quantity of goods manufactured and removed, with the proper officer of Central Excise, as required under Rule 173G(3) read with Rule 54 ibid. Therefore, demands have been confirmed against them along with interest and penalties. &....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....t? He further submitted that the impugned order is in violation of principles of natural justice as no reasonable opportunity to the appellants was given to present their case. Hence, the matter be sent back to the adjudicating authority for denovo adjudication. 3. Heard and considered. 4. We have gone through the impugned order where we find that the appellants were gi....
TaxTMI