2011 (2) TMI 1081
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....: Ashok Jindal 1.The appellants are in appeal against the impugned order, wherein the appeal filed by the appellants before the lower appellate authority was dismissed for non-compliance with the provisions of Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. 2. On the allegation that the appellants have taken credit on photocopy/zerox copy of the challans/invoices, the appellants are not entit....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....the facts of the case, it was found that the issue involved is narrow compass, then the appeal is taken up for final disposal. The Ld. JDR reiterated the impugned order. 5. Heard the DR and perused the records. 6. I find that the impugned order is not on merits and the appeal is dismissed for non-compliance of provisions of Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. As ....
TaxTMI