2011 (3) TMI 1139

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Chakraborty, Advocate for the Appellant (s)   Shri A.K.Sharma, Authorised Representative(JDR) for the Respondent (s)   Per Shri S.S.Kang.   1. Heard both sides.   2. Appellant filed this Appeal against the order dated 06/09.10.2006 whereby it was informed to the Appellant that the request for re-determination of annual capacity does not arise at this stage. The con....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e vide letter dated 28.04.1999 informed the Appellant that the determination of parameter-d is possible only when the mill is in operation. Thereafter Appellant vide letter dated 08.04.2000 informed the revenue authorities regarding re-start of their mill. The contention is that thereafter no opportunity of hearing was granted and their request was declined.   5. In these circumstances as ....