Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2011 (3) TMI 1103

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....R.S. Srova, JDR    Per : Mrs. Archana Wadhwa;   After hearing both the sides, I find that Commissioner (Appeals) has dismissed both the appeals for non compliance with the stay order passed by him directing the applicants to deposit penalty amount of Rs. Three lakhs and Rs. 50,000/-, as a condition of hearing of their appeals.   2. It is seen that the said penalties st....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....was imposed on the main noticee.   3. I find no merits in the above distinction made by the Commissioner (Appeals) in the case of Vijay R. Bohra 2010 (26) ELT 290 (Tri. Ahmd), the Tribunal has taken note of the various decisions. Reference also stands made to the majority decision in the case of M/s. S.K. Colombowala vs. Commissioner of Customs (Import, Mumbai. For better appreciation, Par....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d Settlement Commission or the same stand waived by Settlement Commission, cannot be made the criteria for deciding the legal proposition i.e. as to whether the co-noticees would still be open to imposition of penalty when the case of main noticee stand settled before Settlement Commission. Further, the fact that Settlement Commission has observed that their order is only in respect of main notice....