Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2011 (3) TMI 1055

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... is filed by the Revenue against the Order-in-Appeal No.47/2006-CE dt. 14/2/2006. 2. Heard both sides and perused the records. 3. The issue involved in this case is regarding the service tax liability on the respondent for the period 7/2003 to 1/2005. The Revenue authorities were of the view that the services rendered by the respondent would fall under the category of "Business Auxiliary Ser....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....construed as business auxiliary service. The adjudicating authority has however concluded that these services are covered within the scope of business auxiliary service under the service of collection of cheque / cash from customers under sub-clause (iii) of the definition prior to 10/9/2004 and under sub-clause (vii) subsequently. This collection is a service rendered under business auxiliary ser....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... of the client. No element of such customer care is present in the activity of collection of bills etc. Further, if collection of cheque / cash was part of earlier definition under sub-clause (iii) there would have been no need to spell them out under sub-clause (vii) by amending and enlarging the scope of business auxiliary service." 4. Ld. DR would submit that the grounds of appeal very clear....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n of the submissions made by both sides, we find that the Hon'ble High Court has, in an identical issue in the case of Federal Bank Ltd., has upheld the view of this Bench inasmuch as upholding that the services of collection of telephone bills by the bank for BSNL, Airtel, etc. would not fall under the category of Business Auxiliary Service attracting liability of service tax under Section 65(19)....