2011 (9) TMI 461

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Respondent Per D.N. PANDA: Preliminarily the appeal suffers from maintainability in view of no decision on a particular day by two commissioners who were expected to form a Committee. While one Commissioner signed the Review Order on 16.9.2010 the other Commissioner agrees to his decision on 28.9.2010. There is no ad dam on a particular day by both the Commissioners for a unanimous decision.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....vs. Shree Ganesh Dyeing & Printing Works reported in 2008 (232) ELT 775 (Guj.) has also ruled that the appeal of Revenue does not become maintainable where reason for appeal of Revenue is not stated indicating the order appealed is neither legal nor proper. 3. Learned D.R. relies on the decision of the Tribunal in the case of CCE, Delhi vs. Grand Prints Pvt. Ltd., reported in 2009 (240) ELT 631....