2010 (6) TMI 615

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ellant. S/Shri Chacko George, Sr. Advocate, for the Respondent. [Judgment per : C.N. Ramachandran, J.]. - These are Appeals filed by the department against the orders of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal cancelling adjudication orders demanding duty and penalty for the inputs manufactured and cleared by the related respondent-industries to contract units for manufacture....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t respondents were entitled to exemption. It is against the common order of the Tribunal, these appeals are filed. 2. During hearing counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that appeals are not maintainable under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act because along with duty exemption another question arising is in relation to classification and rate of duty on inputs. Even though c....