Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2011 (10) TMI 193

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....its. The trust was constituted on 22nd August, 1959 under Punjab Town Improvement Act, 1922. During the previous year relevant to assessment year 2007-08 the assessee earned income of Rs. 14.23,42,944/- out which an amount of Rs 3,99,18,967/- was applied. The assessee trust passed a resolution setting apart a sum of Rs. 8,10,00,000/- to be applied for general public utility in the next five succeeding years and informed the assessing officer in Form No. 10 within the time allowed as also filed copy of resolution passed on 17/10/2007. It was, therefore, contended before the assessing officer that the surplus to the extent of Rs. 8,10,00,000/- should be deemed to be the application of income for the purposes of section 11 of the Act. The assessing officer, however, noted that the assessee had debited a sum of Rs. 3,15,88,850/- to income and expenditure account, the amount of Income-tax paid for assessment years 2002-03 and 2003-04 amounting to Rs. 69,67,739/- and Rs. 2,45,78,188/- respectively. TDS on FDRs. of Rs. 4,29,233/- was also claimed as expenditure. However, the AO observed that the assessee upto Assessment Year 2002-03 was assessed as local authority. However, after amendmen....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the Act for the remaining amount, the exemption of the amount in excess of amount applied and accumulated, will not be allowed. The ld. CIT (Appeals), therefore, upheld the order of the assessing officer. Ld CIT(A), however, allowed the claim of the assessee that the income tax paid by the assessee was application of income for the purposes of section 11(1)(a) of the Act. 5. Before us the ld. AR of the assessee submitted that accumulation under section 11(1)(a) is different from accumulation under section 11(2) of the Act. The assessee is entitled for both the accumulations i.e. under section 11(1)(a) to the extent of 15 per cent and under section 11(2) in a case where the assessee is not able to apply 85 per cent of the income. Therefore, section 11(2) is applicable only to the income being 85 per cent after allowing exemption of 15 per cent of the income of the trust. In view of these facts it has been submitted that the assessee is eligible for exemption of Rs. 2,13,30,208/- being 15 per cent of income. The ld. AR of the assessee relied on the ITAT decision in the case of Market Committee, Gharonda v. ACIT (supra). The ld. AR of the assessee also placed reliance on the follow....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he income from such property; **           **           ** Explanation.-For the purposes of clauses (a) and (b),- (1)  in computing the fifteen per cent of the income which may be accumulated or set apart, any such voluntary contributions as are referred to in section 12 shall be deemed to be part of the income; (2) if, in the previous year, the income applied to charitable or religious purposes in India falls short of eighty-five per cent of the income derived during that year from property held under trust, or, as the case may be, held under trust in part, by any amount- (i) for the reason that the whole or any part of the income has not been received during that year, or (ii) for any other reason, then- (a) in the case referred to in sub-clause (i), so much of the income applied to such purposes in India during the previous year in which the income is received or during the previous year immediately following as does not exceed the said amount, and (b) in the case referred to in sub-clause (ii), so much of the income applied to such purposes in India during....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ovisions of this sub-section shall have effect as if for the words "ten years" at both the places where they occur, the words "five years" had been substituted. Explanation.-Any amount credited or paid, out of income referred to in clause (a) or clause (b) of sub-section (1), read with the Explanation to that sub-section, which is not applied, but is accumulated or set apart, to any trust or institution registered under section 12AA or to any fund or institution or trust or any university or other educational institution or any hospital or other medical institution referred to in sub-clause (iv) or sub-clause (v) or sub-clause (vi) or sub-clause (via) of clause (23C) of section 10, shall not be treated as application of income for charitable or religious purposes, either during the period of accumulation or thereafter. 8. From the provisions of section 11(1)(a) it is clear that in a case where the trust or institution applies 85 per cent of income for its objects, the entire income shall be exempt from tax. In other words the law provides a conditional exemption that in a case if the assessee applies 85 per cent of its income for its objects during the year, the whole of the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....eyond 15 per cent [then 25 per cent] can also earn exemption from Income Tax on compliance of the conditions laid down by section 11(2). Section 11(2) while enlarging the scope of exemption by removing the restriction imposed by section 11(1)(a) was held not to take away the exemption allowed by section 11(1)(a). Hon'ble Delhi High Court has, thus, in Bagri Foundation's case (supra) has held that the additional condition by way of section 11(2) inserted with effect from 1/04/2003 is intended only to apply in respect of accumulation in excess of 15 per cent and not to accumulation upto 15 per cent under section 11(1)(a) of the Act. In view of the decision of Hon'ble Delhi High Court it is held that the income applied u/s 11(1)(a) and accumulated u/s11(2) taken together should 85% in order to claim 100% exemption of the income derived by the assessee u/s section 11 of the Act. Any portion of income fall short of 85% will be liable to tax. Consequently in a case where neither any income is applied u/s 11(a) nor accumulated under section 11(2) entire income will be liable tax on the ground that exemption to be allowed is conditional one subject to fulfillment of certain condition of ap....