2011 (1) TMI 887

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the petitioner.   Mr. Yogesh Putney, Advocate for the respondents.   ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J.   1. This order will dispose of CWP Nos. 21169 and 21187 of 2010 as both the petitions involve common question.   2. The petitioner is a statutory body under the provisions of Warehousing Corporation Act, 1962. It claimed its income to be exempt under Section 10(29) of the In....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... of litigation, the matter was remanded for reconsideration as waiver was declined only on the ground that the earlier judgment of this Court was not in the case of the petitioner which was not a valid ground. Thereafter, the impugned order dated 15.6.2010 (Annexure P-13) has been passed holding that there being no earlier view of this Court that the income other than the income derived from letti....