2011 (3) TMI 788

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Advocate, for the Petitioner. Shri Satish Kumar, Sr. Standing Counsel, for the Respondent. [Order]. -  By the impugned order dated 6th December, 2010, The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has partly dismissed the petitioner's application for stay of the order dated 8th September, 2009 passed by the Commissioner, Delhi. The petitioner has been denied stay o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... v. CCE, Hyderabad, 1998 (97) E.L.T. 3 (S.C.) and Narne Tulaman Manufacturers Pvt. Ltd. v. Collector of Central Excise, 1988 (38) E.L.T. 566 (S.C.). It has held that the petitioner has not been able to establish a prima facie case and, therefore, the entire tax amount of Rs. 1,71,40,806/- has been directed to be deposited. 4. During the course of the hearing, learned counsel for the respon....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.....L.T. 501 (S.C.) (iii)   Shapoorji Pallonji Co. Ltd. v. Union of India, 2005 (192) E.L.T. 92 (Bom.) (iv)   CCE v. Man Structurals Ltd., 2001 (130) E.L.T. 401 (S.C.) 6. Reference is made to the order of the Supreme Court in Auto Measurematic Ltd. v. Asstt. Collector of Customs, Excise, Madras, 1997 (96) E.L.T. 14 (S.C.). In the said case while directing the assesse....