Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2011 (10) TMI 120

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....or the Revenue Per:  P.G. Chacko After examining the records and hearing both sides, we are of the view that the appeal itself can be finally disposed of at this stage. Accordingly after dispensing with pre-deposit, we take up the appeal. 2. The appellant is engaged in the manufacture of industrial explosives. They used to draw samples from the production batches for quality control ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ty of such samples has already been settled against the Revenue by the Tribunal in the case of CCE, Nagpur Vs. Economic Explosives Ltd. 2007 (218) E.L.T 535 (Tri.-Mum.). It is pointed out that an appeal filed by the department against the Tribunal's order in the case of Economic Explosives Ltd. (supra) was rejected by the Hon'ble Bombay High Court vide 2009 (242) E.L.T. A86 (Bom.). Learned counsel....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....h Court. In that case it was held by the Hon'ble High Court that as the goods were removed for in-house testing and proper accounts were maintained no payment of duty was necessary. The Hon'ble High Court upheld the Tribunal's order wherein it had been held that excise duty was not to be paid in respect of samples used for testing in in-house laboratory where separate records of the samples drawn ....