Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2011 (11) TMI 38

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... respondent PER  VEERAIYAN Heard both sides on the stay petition. 2. The original authority confirmed the demand of Service Tax of Rs. 29,36,935/- for the period 1.4.2003 to 31.3.2007 along with interest and imposed penalties under various Sections in pursuance of three show-cause notices. On appeal filed by the party, the Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the demand for the period from ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....f three show-cause notices. It is the submission  on behalf of the appellant that entire amount of service tax relating to period from 1.5.2006 from which date the service tax liability became applicable on 'Credit Card Service' stands paid.  4. The learned DR reiterated the findings and reasoning of the Commissioner (Appeals). 5. Taking note of the fact that the appellants have pa....