2011 (3) TMI 555

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... BY : Shri W.L. Hangshing, Jt. CDR, for the Appellant. Shri Gajendra Jain, Advocate, for the Respondent. [Order per : Ashok Jindal, Member (J)]. -  Revenue has filed this appeal against the impugned order wherein the adjudicating authority has exonerated Shri Mohan Raghavan, General Manager of M/s. Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. and not imposed any penalty on him. 2. The facts of t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d an appeal against the order of the Tribunal before the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay and the Hon'ble High Court has remanded the appeal back to the Tribunal to dispose of according to law and on its merits. 3. On perusal of the appeal memo, we observed that this appeal has been filed against M/s. Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. as respondent and in the entire appeal memo no relief has been sough....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....fore, he sought an amendment in the appeal memo as it was a typographical error. 6. Heard and considered. 7. We have gone through the appeal memo as well the ROM application. We find that this appeal has been filed by the Revenue on 17th December, 2002 which was disposed of by this Tribunal on 4-4-2005 against which the Revenue preferred an appeal before the Hon'ble High Court of B....