2011 (8) TMI 261

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Sahab Singh   These appeals are filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur against the Order-in-Appeal dated 30/12/2003.   2. The brief facts of the case are that the respondents were engaged in the manufacture of furniture and parts thereof falling under Chapter 84, 94, 76 and 70 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The respondents were paying excise du....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....97 to Feb.1998 which were confirmed by the Asstt.Commissioner for Rs. 91,437 and Rs.3,34,482/-. Similarly, two show-cause notices were issued for the period Sept.1998 to January, 1999 and February, 1999 to April, 1999. These show-cause notices were adjudicated by the Asstt. Commissioner confirming the demand of Rs. 5,77,019/- and Rs.1,54,667/-. Aggrieved by these aforesaid adjudication orders of t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....being filed as an abundant caution so that the aforesaid Order-in-Appeal passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Nagpur does not attain its finality and further if the Department succeeds in review petition with the Hon ble Supreme Court, the appellate remedy is available.   4. The ld. representative appearing for the respondent stated that their case is squarely covered by....