Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2011 (1) TMI 513

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Shah i/b. PDS Legal, for the Respondent. [Order]. - P.C. : Whether the CESTAT was justified in condoning the delay in filing the reconciliation statement under Regulation 7 of the Project Import Regulations, 1986 is the question raised in this appeal. 2. During the period 1993-94 the respondent had imported capital goods required for setting up of coal handling plant under the Projec....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tory, the adjudicating officer declined to take the statement on record and passed the order in original by declining to grant the benefit of exemption under the Project Import Regulations. 5. On appeal filed by the respondent, the Tribunal by the impugned order set aside the assessment order and remanded the matter back to the adjudicating authority with directions to pass fresh order aft....