2011 (4) TMI 345
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....anti Mandal, Vikram Ganguly and S.C. Ghosh, Advocates, for the Appellant. Shri Avijit Bhattacharjee and Mrs. Sarbani Kar, Advocates, for the Respondent. [Order]. - This order will dispose of all the appeals referred to above. 2. The facts have been taken from criminal appeal No. 1129/2006. The matter arises out of a complaint under Section 19 of the Standards of Weights and Measur....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....s the person responsible and incharge of the affairs of the Company. It was pointed out that in the complaint the bare language of Section 74 had been reproduced without naming any body as being responsible for the day-to-day affairs of the Company. The averment made in the complaint which is relevant to the matter is reproduced below : "That the persons committed this offence are companies. So....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....thing to indicate that he was in charge of and responsible to the Corporation relating to its day-to-day affairs of the Corporation at the time of commission of the alleged offence, the present application deserves to be allowed in part and the proceeding against the said petitioner No. 1 M.B. Lal is to be quashed." 4. Today, before us, Mr. Pradeep Ghosh, the learned senior counsel for the....
TaxTMI