2011 (5) TMI 268
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....or the Respondent. [Order per : Akil Kureshi, J. (Oral)]. - Main matter, i.e. Special Civil Application No. 3984 of 2011 was disposed of by an order dated 11-4-2011. Respondent herein, original-petitioner, had approached this Court contending that his case is identical to the one decided by this Court in Special Civil Application No. 6151 of 2010 by judgment dated 1-10-2010 [2011 (267)....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... were allowed by this Court by the said judgment. Issue pertains to examination which department wishes to conduct for renewal of license for Custom House Agent. The petitioner claims to have passed such examination in past and contends that he should not be subjected to fresh examination in view of the said judgment dated 1-10-2010. We do not propose to make any conclusive observation with res....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....f ultimate decision that department takes aggrieves the petitioner, it would be open for him to challenge the same in accordance with law. With above directions, the petition is disposed of. Direct service permitted." 2. From the order itself, it can be clearly seen that we have not expressed any conclusive opinion with respect to the contention of the petitioner. We have also grante....
TaxTMI