Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2010 (8) TMI 641

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....er making minor additions as under :- 1 Disallowances of expenses as per para-5 Rs. 8,850   2 Disallowance of depreciation as per para-6 Rs. 660   3 Disallowance of interest, as per para-7 Rs. 31,594   4 Addition on a/c of cash deposit, as per para-8 Rs. 500   5 Disallowances of electrical expenses, as per para-9 Rs. 25,879   6 Addition on a/c Insurance premium, as per para-10 Rs. 19,134         Rs. 86,617       Rs. 38,43,951   Less : Deduction u/s 80E   Rs. 31,594     Total income Rs. 38,12,357   Rounded off u/s 288A   Rs. 38,12,360 The AO also initiated penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c)  in respect of sum of Rs.32,84,663/- declared during the course of survey. In response to show cause notice issued by the AO before levy of penalty the assessee furnished following explanations:- "1. The survey was conducted u/s 133A on 22/09/2006 and declared income from undisclosed sources amounting to Rs.32,84,6....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rding  to  which  penalty  is leviable equivalent 100% to 300% of tax sought to be evaded and tax sought to be evaded is a difference between tax levied on returned income and tax levied on assessed income. Since in the present case tax levied on returned income and on the assessed income is the same, barring few minor additions, penalty could not be levied in respect of amount declared by the assessee in survey.  The ld. AR then referred to the following decisions :- - CIT vs. M. Pachamuthu & Another (2007) 295 ITR 502 (Mad) - Amir Chand vs. ITO (1994), 49 ITD 606 (Del) - ACIT vs. Gandevikar Jewellers P. Ltd. - Bhagat & Co. vs. ACIT (2006) 101 TTJ (Mum) 553 - Orient Press Ltd. vs. JCIT (2006) 99 TTJ 1091 (Mumbai) 6. For the sake of convenience  we reproduce  section 271(1)(c)  as under :- "Sec. 271(1) -If the Assessing Officer or the Commissioner (Appeals) [or the Commissioner] in the course of any proceedings under this Act, is satisfied that any person - (a)....... (b)....... (c) has concealed the particulars of his income or furnished inaccurate particulars of....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... clause (iii) of this sub-section,  the expression 'the amount of tax sought to be evaded'- [(a) in any case where the amount of income in respect of which particulars have been  concealed  or  inaccurate  particulars  have  been  furnished  has  the  effect  of reducing the loss declared in the return or converting that loss into income, means the tax that would have been chargeable on the income in respect of which particulars have been concealed or inaccurate particulars have been furnished had such income been the total income;] (b) in any case to which Explanation 3 applies, means the tax on the total income assessed  [as  reduced  by  the  amount  of  advance  tax,  tax  deducted  at source,  tax collected  at source  and  self-assessment  tax  paid  before  the issue  of notice  under section 148]; (c) in any other case, means  the difference  between  the tax on the total  income assessed and the tax that would have been chargeable had such total income been reduced by the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....l conclusion against the assessee by determining his right or  liability.  Merely carrying out survey under section 133A does  not create any liability against the assessee which is created only through assessment proceedings or penalty proceedings. Therefore, the ld. DR is incorrect in his submission that survey being a proceedings and AO has discovered concealment during survey, therefore, the assessee is liable for penalty under section 271(1)(c). In this regard we refer to some common definitions of word proceedings. Proceedings  -  proceedings  have  been  defined  in  various  ways.  It includes any suit, appeal or application. It includes any procedural means for seeking redress from the Tribunal or Court; the business conducted by a Court or other official body, the term "proceedings" may include the institution of action against defendant, the submissions of defence and trial. It also means a legal action or process and act done by an authority of a court of law; any step taken by either party in a legal proceeding, an action or course of action before a court. It is also a prescribed mode of action for carrying i....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... of section 145(3) and income can be estimated in accordance with section 144. But where the AO accepts the  income  declared  in the  return  of income  then assessee  cannot  be charged  for  any  contumacious   conduct.  There  are  in  fact  several judgments  according  to  which  penalty  is  not  leviable  if  addition  is deleted.  Hon.  Punjab &  Haryana  High  Court  in  CIT  vs.  Prakash Industries Ltd. (2010)  322 ITR 622 (P & H) held that basis for levy of penalty   is   returned   income.   If   additions   are   deleted   in   quantum proceedings penalty could not be imposed. The Hon. High Court has held as under :- "A search showed that the assessee had received amount of Rs.3.5 crores from the bank account of S. Faridabad. It was observed that the firm was a bogus firm and the claim of the assessee that the amount was received towards consideration for sale of material, was&nbs....