2010 (12) TMI 542

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r the Respondent. ORDER 1. Heard both sides. 2. The appeal is against confirmation of demand of Rs. 6,807 towards Service Tax along with interest and imposition of penalty of Rs. 6,500. 3. The appellants is a manufacturer of excisable goods and in connection with receipt of inputs, they are availing the services of GTA. As deemed service provider, the appellants were required to pay th....