Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2010 (8) TMI 613

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....oner. S/Shri B.N. Singh SCC, Shishir Kumar and Shamboo Chopra, for the Respondent. [Order]. -  By means of this writ petition, the petitioner claimed the refund of Rs. 7,50,613/- deposited towards supervision charges in excess what was due. It appears that the provision for the payment of supervision charges under which petitioner has paid the supervision charges, has been withdrawn.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....,33,490/- and Rs. 2,03,131/- is refundable to the petitioner. 5. It is further contended that since the amount deposited was not in the nature of the excise duty, the petitioner is not entitled for the interest. 6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has not been refunded any amount till date, which was admittedly refundable to the petitioner. 7.&ems....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....dmitted that a sum of Rs. 6,36,621/- is refundable to the petitioner. The petitioner agreed to accept the said amount. 11. We do not see any justification for withholding the amount after the order dated 19-8-2001 by which the refund has been adjudicated and refundable amount has been determined. 12. In the facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the view that the respondent....