2010 (8) TMI 613
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....oner. S/Shri B.N. Singh SCC, Shishir Kumar and Shamboo Chopra, for the Respondent. [Order]. - By means of this writ petition, the petitioner claimed the refund of Rs. 7,50,613/- deposited towards supervision charges in excess what was due. It appears that the provision for the payment of supervision charges under which petitioner has paid the supervision charges, has been withdrawn.....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....,33,490/- and Rs. 2,03,131/- is refundable to the petitioner. 5. It is further contended that since the amount deposited was not in the nature of the excise duty, the petitioner is not entitled for the interest. 6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has not been refunded any amount till date, which was admittedly refundable to the petitioner. 7.&ems....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....dmitted that a sum of Rs. 6,36,621/- is refundable to the petitioner. The petitioner agreed to accept the said amount. 11. We do not see any justification for withholding the amount after the order dated 19-8-2001 by which the refund has been adjudicated and refundable amount has been determined. 12. In the facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the view that the respondent....
TaxTMI