2011 (4) TMI 269
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....tmental Representative (Jt.CDR) for the Revenue Per Shri Justice R.M.S. Khandeparkar: Heard the Advocate for the appellants and the Jt.CDR for the respondent. This appeal arises from the order dated 10.8.2010 passed by the Commissioner, Allahabad. By the impugned order, the Commissioner has confirmed the demand of duty to the tune of Rs.1,01,077/- along with interest and equal ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e items was in the Departments knowledge as evidence from the previous adjudication order mentioned above, but in case of Anthracine Oil I find that it is a product which was not a part of previous adjudication order and that the fact was not in the Departments knowledge previously. As such the demand of duty on clearance of this product is not barred by time limitation. The total duty involved on....
TaxTMI