Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2011 (3) TMI 323

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....; Per : Mrs. Archana Wadhwa;   After dispensing with the condition of pre-deposit of interest of Rs. 1,36,026/- and penalty of Rs. 5000/-, confirmed by the lower authorities, I proceed to decide the appeal itself on account of subsequent development in the matter.   2. As per facts on record, appellants received inputs from an 100% EOU. Rule 3(7) of Central Excise Rules prescrib....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Pune 2008 (225) ELT 513 (Tri. Mumbai.) and in their own case vide order No. A/2355-2356/WZB/AHD/2009 dated 30.10.2009. Accordingly, they filed refund claim before the authorities.   4. The said refund claims filed by the appellants to the extent of Rs. 5,84,098/- stands sanctioned by the original adjudicating authority. As such, it is the contention of the appellants that they were requir....