2010 (3) TMI 769
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsels appearing for the respondents. 2. The main contention of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner is that the assessing authority had passed the assessment order, dated 15.12.2010, without giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. He had also submitted that no proper reasons had been given ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....behalf of the respondents had submitted that an assessment order had been passed against the petitioner under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax, 1961, determining the total income of the petitioner as Rs.1,94,75,590/-, and raising a demand of Rs.26,92,572/-, payable by the petitioner. He had also submitted that sufficient opportunity had been given to the petitioner before the assessment order had ....
TaxTMI