Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2011 (7) TMI 96

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....p; JUDGMENT   CHITRA VENKATARAMAN, J.   Though the Revenue had raised two questions of law before this Court in the appeal preferred in respect of the block assessment years covering the period from 1986 to 1987 to 1996-1997 and upto 23.2.1996, yet this Court had admitted only the second question of law, which reads as follows:   "Whether in the facts and circumstances o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....is Court to consider. A reading of the order of the Tribunal shows that the assessee's place of business was searched, on 23.2.1996. In the block assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer assessed the income for the block period 1986-1987 to 1996-1997, upto 23.2.1996, at 60% plus 15% surcharge. The assessee claimed 100% depreciation of the windmill purchased and commissioned, which was further....