2011 (7) TMI 38

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Prakash Kumar, Advocate.  For Respondents: Mr. Sanjiv Rajpal, Advocate. SANJIV KHANNA, J. This is an application for review of the decision dated 20th April, 2011. It is filed by Ravina & Associates Private Limited, the writ petitioner, who is hereinafter referred to as the applicant. 2. In paragraph 4 of the review application, it is stated that inadvertent factual errors have o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... in the assessment year 2005-06, in the income tax return prior to 6th March, 2006. In fact the due date for filing of return for assessment year 2006-07 was 31st October, 2006 and the return was filed on 12th February, 2007. (c) The FIR is not in respect of receipt of Rs.14.58 crores in the assessment years 2004-05 and 2005-06, which pertain to the Obra project. (d) M/s Ravina & Associates Pvt....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... had raised contentions, which were examined but rejected. 5. In paragraph 5 of the review Application, the applicant has alleged that following contentions have been overlooked:- (a) There is no investigation in respect of the Obra project. (b) Allegations of corruption under the Prevention of Corruption Act are figment of imagination as the project was reviewed by the Government of Indi....