2010 (10) TMI 408

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... S/Shri Pradeep S. Jetly with S.D. Bhosale and R. Ashokan, for the Respondent. [Order]. - P.C : Both these appeals are directed against the order dated 9th November, 2009, whereby the appeal filed by the Revenue was allowed and the cross-objection filed by the respondent was rejected. 2. Perused impugned order which is cryptic and unreasoned. It makes a reference to the written submiss....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nterest is levied, the assessee would be benefited by delaying the duty payment and still not paying the interest. (3)     Interest under Rule 7(4) is not attracted if differential duty paid before the date of Order passed for finalizing the assessment - decision of CESTAT in Respondent's own case - The contention of the Appellants that they have filed appeal and therefore t....