TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2011 (1) TMI 350
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ging the order dated 22-1-2007 passed by the Joint Secretary, Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, New Delhi by which the revision filed by the petitioner has been rejected. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner is a Company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act. The petitioner is engaged in the manufacture of C.R. Sheets/Coils/Sheets/G.P. S....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ppeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) Customs and Central Excise, Meerut-1, now at Ghaziabad. The said appeal has been allowed vide order dated 27-3-2006 and the order of the Assistant Commissioner, Central Excise, Ghaziabad has been set aside. 4. Being aggrieved by the order of the Commissioner (Appeals), the petitioner filed revision before the Central Government under Section 35(E) of t....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....the foreign supplier, being of defective nature, on no commercial FOB value. The parties were required to pay/reverse an amount equal to the credit availed in respect of such goods as per the provisions of Rule 3(4) of the Rules. But the petitioner cleared these goods on payment of duty and filed refund/rebate claim. Further, in all the cases of exports, the party has to provide BRC of proceeds to....