2010 (11) TMI 252
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....adhav Rao, Advocate, for the Appellant. Shri Sumit Kumar, DR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Justice R.M.S. Khandeparkar, President]. - In the course of arguments, learned Counsel for the appellants drew our attention to the order dated 21-7-2010 passed by Apex Court in Civil Appeal No. 7060 of 2009 and connected matters. The order reads thus - "We find that a number of Civil appeals viz., ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....g the view in the contra to the Board's letter and the Notification. The appellants have maintained the records of the inputs used in the photography, nowhere it is stated in the Circular and Notification that the inputs used in the photography should be mentioned in the invoices/bills issued to the customer. The reasoning given by the Commissioner is not sustainable. In view of the clarification ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....er dated 23-4-2009 discloses that the said order refers to remittance of the matter to the Tribunal and not of dismissal of the petition filed by Revenue. However, the order dated 21-7-2010 specifically refers to a dismissal order dated 23-4-2009. Learned Counsel for the appellants states that there is no other order passed on 23-4-2009 referred to in the said appeal and reference to the order dat....