2010 (12) TMI 393

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., for the Appellant. Shri Khaitan, Sr. Advocate, for the Respondent. [Order].  - All these appeals [item Nos. 40 to 50] have been preferred by the revenue against a common judgment and order of the learned Tribunal dated 27th March, 2008. The learned Tribunal in its turn by this judgment and/or order disposed of a number of matters [29 appeals]. 2. The entire judgment of the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... is so to say perverse and without any basis whatsoever. 4. We have the benefit of hearing Mr. Khaitan, learned Senior Advocate for the respondent. He draws our attention to the fact finding of the learned Tribunal and submits that the question formulated at the time of admission relates to the fact and not the law. The learned Tribunal has followed its earlier decision wherein it has been....