2011 (3) TMI 234

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....appellant   Shri S. Murthy, Advocate, for respondent   Per: P.G. Chacko   This application filed by the Revenue (appellant) seeks stay of operation of the impugned order wherein the learned Commissioner (Appeals) allowed refund of an amount of customs duty without time-bar. After hearing both sides, we are of the view that the appeal itself requires to be disposed of at thi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... application dated 13.6.2008 was rejected as time-barred by the original authority, which held that the refund claim had been filed beyond six months from the date of payment of duty and hence liable to be rejected as time-barred. Aggrieved, the respondent preferred an appeal to the Commissioner (Appeals) who set aside the lower authority s decision and directed it to reconsider the refund claim, ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the assessing authority was to determine the entitlement of the assessee in the context of finalization of the provisional assessments and, for the assessee, the requirement was to apply for refund of any excess amount of duty found upon such finalization. Such refund application could be filed under Section 27 of the Customs Act within a period of six months from the date of adjustment of duty a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e department to contend that the assessment was not provisional. The averment to the contra made in the present appeal is without any factual basis and, for that reason, the very basis of this appeal would collapse. It is not deniable that the provisional assessments were finalized by the Assistant Commissioner of Customs concerned and this fact duly notified to the Assistant Commissioner of Custo....