2010 (10) TMI 283

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... for the Appellant. Shri Alok Arora, Advocate, for the Respondent. [Order].  - Revenue has filed these appeals alongwith the application for stay of operation of the impugned order. The Stay Applications have been filed in routine manner. There was no merit. Hence rejected. The issue involved in the appeal also taken up for final disposal as agreed by both the sides. 2. The f....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ellate authority on the ground that the penalty should be for each default that is for 15 Months separately to the respondent did not pay the duty electronically and for each default they have to pay Rs. 5,000/- and the respondent came in appeal before the lower appellate authority for reduction of penalty. The Lower Appellate Authority rejected both the appeals. 4. Aggrieved from the said orde....