Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2010 (10) TMI 279

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....[Order per : P.G. Chacko, Member (J)]. - In this appeal of the assessee, the challenge is against the appellate Commissioner's order dismissing the assessee's appeal (filed against an adverse order of the original authority) for non-compliance with Section 35F of the Central Excise Act. There is no representation for the appellant today despite notice, nor is there any request for adjournment. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... that the above amount of Rs. 1.00 lakh should have been deposited through TR-6 challan. On this basis, the assessee's appeal came to be dismissed for non-compliance with Section 35F. 4. After hearing the learned SDR, we are of the view that pre-deposit of the duty amount by way of debit in MODVAT account can be accepted as sufficient compliance with Section 35F and, therefore, the assessee ....