2010 (10) TMI 279
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ish Mohan, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : P.G. Chacko, Member (J)]. - In this appeal of the assessee, the challenge is against the appellate Commissioner's order dismissing the assessee's appeal (filed against an adverse order of the original authority) for non-compliance with Section 35F of the Central Excise Act. There is no representation for the appellant today despite notice, nor....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....mpliance' with Section 35F. He took the view that the above amount of Rs. 1.00 lakh should have been deposited through TR-6 challan. On this basis, the assessee's appeal came to be dismissed for non-compliance with Section 35F. 4. After hearing the learned SDR, we are of the view that pre-deposit of the duty amount by way of debit in MODVAT account can be accepted as sufficient compliance ....
TaxTMI