TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2010 (8) TMI 462
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... lordships would be pleased to direct the Respondents to return of documents, foreign currencies and things sought for vide petitioner's Application dated 30-11-2009, and placed as Annexure-B and further application dated 12-4-2010 placed as Annexure-F, to the writ petition and pass such other orders as may be deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. (c) Any other relief which is suitable and necessary in the circumstances of this case be granted.' 2. The main grievance ventilated in this petition is that the officials of the Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad, during the course of search of the office premises of the petitioner on 17-11-2009 have seized various documents/articles....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... (10) Photo copy of Export costing calculation documents. (11) Original DRT Papers for case pertaining to M/s. Platinum Corporation Ltd. (12) Photo copy of telephone diary of Mr. Pranav Amratlal. 3. Subsequently the petitioner also issued a legal notice to the respondent No. 2, through its Counsel. Thereafter, repeated requests were made to the respondents to return the said documents, however, the same have not been returned, causing serious prejudice to the petitioner. 4.In response to the petition, the respondents have filed affidavits-in-reply dated 22-1-2010 as well as 27-7-2010. In paragraph No. 5 of the affidavit-in-reply dated 27-7-2010, it is categorically averred that as per administrative inst....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Headquarters Office. However, as regards the documents listed at Sr. No. 3, 7 and 10, the respondents have expressed reservations regarding returning the same on the ground that the same are required for related investigation. 8. Thus, in principle the respondents have agreed to return the articles/documents enumerated at serial No. 1, 2, 4, 6 and 11 in original. But, it appears that the respondents have still not received approval from the Headquarters Office. Learned Counsel for the respondents in not in a position to state as to within what period of time such approval is likely to be received. In the circumstances, the petitioner cannot be made to wait endlessly for return of the said documents/articles. This Court is, therefor....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....riod of one week from today, that is, on or before 18-8-2010, whether or not the respondents receive the approval from the Headquarters Office for return of the same. [ii] The documents listed at Sr. No. 3, 7 and 10, shall be returned in original on or before 9-9-2010. [iii] Photocopies of the documents enumerated at Serial No. 5, 8, 9 and 12 which have not yet been furnished, shall be furnished within a week from today, that is, on or before 18-8-2010. [iv] The respondents may retain copies of all the originals for the purpose of their investigation. [v] The petitioner shall file an undertaking before this Court on or before 16-8-2010, stating that the original documents shall be produced as and when called for by the....