Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2011 (4) TMI 67

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....or the appellant.   ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J.   This appeal has been preferred by the assessee under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 (for short, "the Act") against order of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi dated 17.9.2009, claiming following substantial questions of law:-   "a) Whether the Ld. Respondent erred in law in imposing a heavy Redem....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 2. The appellant imported goods and sought clearance thereof under the provisions of the Act. It was found that the assessee had wrongly declared lesser value of goods and the import was against the import policy. Accordingly, the goods were held to be liable for confiscation under Section 111(d) of the Act. The adjudicating authority after due procedure, ordered confiscation of the goods but ....