2011 (5) TMI 2

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....yar, Adv.   For Respondent(s) Mr. Rana Mukherjee, Adv., Mr. Abhijit Sengupta, Adv, Ms. Anima Kujur, Adv., Mr. Yogesh K. Jagia, Adv., Mr. Darpan K. M., Adv., Ms. Hetu Arora, Adv.   O R D E R   Since the issues raised in the present appeals are similar, we propose to dispose of all these appeals by this common judgment and order.   These appeals are directed against t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nge in classification from Sub-heading 9022.14 to 9022.12 is set aside;   (iii) The charge of mis-declaration as regards the number of machines imported by M/s. Tanya Diagnostic Centre is upheld. The matter is remanded to the original adjudicating authority for quantification of payment of duty on the said machines after deciding the classification;   (iv) The issue of deciding the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....indicate that the confiscation order passed by the Commissioner has been upheld. We are also informed that redemption fine has since been paid. So far the issue with regard to the classification is concerned, the matter has been remitted back and is to be considered by the Tribunal afresh in accordance with law and in terms of the directions issued by the Tribunal.   So far the charge of m....