Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2010 (12) TMI 173

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ue is involved in this appeal. The appeal has been rejected by Commissioner (Appeals) on the ground of delay in filing appeal. According to the learned Commissioner, the appellant had received the order on 13.4.04, whereas the appeal was filed on 3.2.06.   2. Learned Consultant on behalf of the appellant submitted that the partner Shri Farook has not at all received the Order-in-Original. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... right, whereas in the latest paper filed by Shri Farook, the letters are almost vertical. Even the signature in the acknowledgement and original appeal paper look almost similar. Further, no evidence has been produced by the appellant to show that the acknowledgement was not signed by Shri Farook except the bald statement that it was not he who signed it. The acknowledgement was obtained by juris....