Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2009 (12) TMI 577

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Shri P. Dhudhoria, Advocate, for the Respondent. [Order]. - The Court : Let four affidavits-of-service filed in court today be kept with the records. 2. In the writ petition, H.V. Axles Ltd., a company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and stated to be 100% subsidiary holding company of M/s. Tata Motors Ltd. is petitioner No. 1 and Manager (Finance) of t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....09. However, the Tribunal without considering the merit of the miscellaneous application had held that there was no manifest error in the order dated 15th June, 2009 and had dismissed the miscellaneous application. 6. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that since the cost of production does not include the interest expenditure which is supported by the standards maintained b....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....fest error, the Tribunal is justified in rectifying its mistake, the Tribunal while passing the order dated 9th October, 2009 should have considered the issue in the said perspective. 7. Perused the order dated 9th October, 2009 passed by the Tribunal. It is evident that the Tribunal before holding that there was no manifest error in the stay order did not go into the merits of the miscel....