TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2010 (9) TMI 395
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....anakaram, Advocate, for the Appellant. Smt. Sudha Koka, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Justice R.M.S. Khandeparkar, President (Oral)]. - Heard the learned Advocate for the appellant and DR for the Respondent. 2. The present appeal arises from Order dated 1-8-2007 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), Guntur. By the impugned order, the Commissioner (Appeals) had partly allowed the....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
...., therefore, under the letter dated 28th July, 2003, sought permission for destruction of the said products and requested for drawing of test samples and laboratory report. The appellants also furnished analytical report of their own laboratory certifying the product to be unfit for human consumption. Subsequently, they informed about the need for destruction of 737 drums/barrels. Further, under t....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) which came to be partly allowed under the impugned order dated 1-8-2007 as stated above. 4. While assailing the impugned order, the learned Advocate for the appellant submitted that once the fact that 935 drums, including 198 drums received in April 2004, were, destroyed is confirmed and accepted by the authority, there was no justification for d....