Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2010 (9) TMI 395

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....anakaram, Advocate, for the Appellant. Smt. Sudha Koka, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Justice R.M.S. Khandeparkar, President (Oral)]. - Heard the learned Advocate for the appellant and DR for the Respondent. 2. The present appeal arises from Order dated 1-8-2007 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), Guntur. By the impugned order, the Commissioner (Appeals) had partly allowed the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., therefore, under the letter dated 28th July, 2003, sought permission for destruction of the said products and requested for drawing of test samples and laboratory report. The appellants also furnished analytical report of their own laboratory certifying the product to be unfit for human consumption. Subsequently, they informed about the need for destruction of 737 drums/barrels. Further, under t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) which came to be partly allowed under the impugned order dated 1-8-2007 as stated above. 4. While assailing the impugned order, the learned Advocate for the appellant submitted that once the fact that 935 drums, including 198 drums received in April 2004, were, destroyed is confirmed and accepted by the authority, there was no justification for d....