2010 (8) TMI 309

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Appaiah Sharma, Sr. SC for CBEC, for the Appellant. Shri Gandra Mohan Rao, for the Respondent. [Judgment per : V.V.S. Rao, J.]. - The controversy is in a narrow compass in this appeal. Therefore, though the interlocutory matter at the instance of the respondent is listed, with the consent of both the Counsel, we dispose of the appeal itself. 2. Respondent is a manufacturer of d....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... said notification. The respondent submitted explanation on 17-9-2008, inter alia, contending that they cleared defective/rejected goods under AR 3A to the original suppliers, and that the same has been duly certified by the Range Officials at the receiving end. After adjudicating the matter, the proposed show cause notice levy was confirmed. 3. Aggrieved by the order of the adjudicating ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sions, though it is unwarranted. With their assistance, we have perused the Notification No. 22/2003-C.E., dated 31-3-2003. In view of the same, while we are not inclined to set aside the order passed by the learned Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, we are satisfied that the orders of stay granted by the learned Tribunal cannot be continued in absolute terms as there is a contentio....