TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2010 (9) TMI 375
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Kishore Mishra and Ms. Aparna Jha, Advocates, for the Appellant. S/Shri B. Bhattacharya, ASG, R.P. Bhatt, Sr. Advocate, K. Swami, B.K. Prasad, Ms. Shipra Ghose and Mrs. Anil Katiyar, Advocates, for the Respondent. [Order]. - This appeal is directed against the order dated 26-4-2005 passed by the CESTAT, West Zonal Branch at Mumbai upholding the Order-in-Original dated 28-10-1997 passed b....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....0-1997 against the appellant. 3. Being aggrieved by the aforesaid order, the appellant filed a statutory appeal before the CESTAT, which also came to be dismissed under the impugned order. 4. Counsel appearing for the appellant has submitted before us that the value declared by the appellant were fair and that the same were based on the prices given by the manufacturers and that ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ther recorded a finding to the effect that prices declared by the appellant were not true transactional value and that they were importing the goods at a lower price to evade the customs duty. The aforesaid findings were challenged before the Tribunal. The Tribunal has considered the respective cases and finally upheld the aforesaid findings mainly relying upon the prices of similar goods. 7.&#....