Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2010 (8) TMI 243

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tc. They procured some of the inputs like Copper Plates/Sheets in Coil etc., from a 100% EOU. The supplying unit being a 100% EOU, has paid duties of excise in terms of proviso to Section 3 of Central Excise Act, being an amount equal to the aggregate of the duties of customs which would be leviable under the Customs Act or any other law for the time being in force on like goods produced or manufactured outside India if imported into India. Thus, the supplying unit has paid excise duty which included amounts equal to the basic customs duty, additional duty leviable under Section 3(1) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 and additional duty to counter balance sales tax and other local levies leviable under Section 3(5) of the Customs Tariff Act. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..../06-Cus., dated 5-6-06 also refers the levy of 4% as CVD/special CVD. Therefore, he submits that they are eligible for the cenvat credit and the demand is not sustainable. 5. Alternatively, he also submits that the dispute involves interpretation of legal provisions and there is no suppression of any relevant information or mis-statement on the part of the appellants and therefore, part of the demand is time barred as the show cause notice was issued on 11-1-08. He also submits that, on the same ground, no penalty can be imposed. 6.Ld. SDR reiterates the findings and reasoning of the Commissioner (Appeals). 7. I have carefully considered the submissions from both sides and perused the records. In the present case, the u....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....der clauses (i), (ii), (iii), (iv), (v), (vi) and (via); (viia) the additional duty leviable under sub-section (5) of section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act………….. In respect of inputs procured from 100% EOU, and Cenvat Credit Rules provides for taking credit based on a formula prescribed under Rule 3(7) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The dispute is whether the term CVD used in the said sub-rule 3(7) refers only to additional duty leviable under Section 3(1) of the Customs Tariff Act or that the same also includes the additional duty leviable under sub-section 3(5) of the Customs Tariff Act. Undoubtedly, from 1-3-05, if the inputs were imported, the manufacturer would be eligible for cenvat credit of duties paid under Section 3....