2009 (8) TMI 727

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rivastava, C.S., for the Appellant. Shri R.K. Chakraborty, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order]. - Heard both sides. 2. Appellant filed this appeal against the impugned order challenging the imposition of penalty under Sections 76, 77 and 78 of the Finance Act on the ground that the amount of S. Tax alongwith interest has been paid suo motu and the Revenue was informed accordingly vi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he entire proceedings will conclude. The contention is that in the present case, there is no suppression as appellant vide letter dated 10-3-05 informed the Revenue that they are getting iron ore from parties through lorries and made a request for registration under the service tax under category of goods transport agency and the same was granted and appellants were filing regularly returns and pa....