2010 (6) TMI 347

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....mal Jeet Singh, Advocate, for the Appellant. Shri Rajinder Gupta, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order (Oral)]. - Heard both sides on the Miscellaneous Application No. 953/09 filed by the Department seeking modification of the Stay Order No. 26/09-SM (Br.) dated 4-2-2009. The order dated 4-2-2009 reads as under :- "At the outset, it is noted that the entire duty demand of Rs. 1,22,187/- sta....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d amount involved was Rs. 1,22,791/-. 4. Learned Advocate for the appellants submits that the contention of the Department is correct and the mistake has occurred due to similarity of figures in both the disputes and that they deeply regret the errors. He also submits that they have since deposited an amount of Rs. 1,22,187/- on 12-6-2010 and submitted the copy of GAR-7 proforma which is ....