2010 (8) TMI 211

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....itioner. S/Shri T.K. Hazra and K.K. Maity, Advocates, for the Respondent. [Order]. - The Court : In this application, being G.A. No. 2321 of 2010 filed in connection with WP No. 87 of 2010, the petitioner has prayed for a direction on the Commissioner of Customs (Airport and Administration ), Kolkata, the respondent No. 2, to cancel the order of suspension dated 13th January, 2010 and to ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ceedings have not been concluded, as a result, the petitioner is suffering the order of suspension. Submission is that on 30th June, 2010, the respondent No. 2, has issued a notice modifying the show cause notice dated 24th February, 2010 indicating that the petitioner is answerable to the Commissioner of Customs, New Delhi, and explanation should be submitted to the Enquiry Officer nominated by t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... been completed. Rather the respondent No. 2 has issued a corrigendum dated 30th June, 2010 to the notice to show cause modifying the show cause notice dated 24th February, 2010 to the extent that the petitioner is -answerable to the Commissioner of Customs, New Delhi. In my view, when the writ petition is pending before the High Court, the respondent No. 2 should have sought leave of the Court be....