Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2008 (9) TMI 578

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....vastava, Member (T) REPRESENTED BY :        Mrs. T.F. Irani, Advocate, for the Appellant. Shri Hitesh Shah, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Jyoti Balasundaram, Vice-President]. -  In this case vide order-in-original No. 30/97 dated 19-12-1997 the Commissioner of Central Excise confirmed a demand of Rs. 39,53,517/- against M/s. Unique Enterp....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....;Vide final order No. 61/CEX/2005 dated 23-12-2005 the applications were rejected under sub-section (7) of Section 32F for non-cooperation by the applicants and the cases were sent back to the Tribunal for its disposal in accordance with the provisions of the Act, as if no application under Section 32E of the Act had been made. This order has been received by the applicants on 28-12-2005. The appl....