Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1995 (2) TMI 363

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of the petitioner filed under section 21-A of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948, seeking rectification of the order of the Tribunal dated March 27, 1991, which was rejected mainly on the ground that there did not appear to be any mistake apparent from the record, as envisaged under the aforesaid section of the Act. Case of the petitioner is that in view of the subsequent judgment of the Supre....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... [1988] 70 STC 191; [1988] 173 ITR 1 and submitted that subsequent judgment of the Supreme Court could be held to be made a basis for rectification as the earlier judgment passed has to be held to be the result of mistake, "apparent from the record". It is submitted and we agree that in view of the judgment in the aforesaid case, the Tribunal was under legal obligation to take into account the jud....